It is okay for if taken without certificate. Paying for this content is not worth it. Full of gramatical errors (okay, maybe it is not important, but come on, you are paying for what is supposed to high quality course); same/similar information is provided many times in the form of pptx/pdf/docx files which then is repeated yet again in video materials too. I

There was some very interesting content in this course, however: I strongly feel that the reading should be updated. Also, a very annoying thing: the many spelling and grammar errors in the quizzes at the end of each week that sometimes make it difficult to understand the intention of the question.

The beginning sessions were helpful and I learned a lot, but the quality of the course seemed to lessen as it progressed. The final quiz had many careless errors in it and was pretty obviously just thrown together.

I learned very little from what i knew before. it's definitely a beginner course, and a lot of it is common sense. learned some new theories and ideas behind managing.

This course did not meet my expectations. So, I won't pay for it. I took benifit just from 20% i maximum of the informations that were presented in the course.

The course description claims it to be a practical guide, but most of the content was very theoretical or very superficial with little practical relevance.

there were serious spelling mistakes and grammar issues in the questions on the assessments and that made it challenging to understand the questions

It’s called a practical guide, yet there’s a lot of theory and reading involved. I’m disappointed, I was expecting more examples

The course needs lot of situation based examples. The course is full of terminologies and it is difficult to make a connect.

Course offered little to no information that couldn't been found from Wikipedia. I was disappointed in it's poor quality.

Dated course and lecturers. all theory not case studies at all. Not a Silicon Valley style of course

Quite a dry and boring course. A lot of obvious content delivered in flowery language.

Course was very academic and not as practical as the title suggested.

It´s ok but to much of description.

Questions like - who was the author of this theory..- is it that important? 99% of people will foget the author very soon anyway. Is it important to remember the name or the information? A lot of videos just repeat presentation or reading Quiz section is usually just two questions with very obvious wrong and right option Some readings ask to read some book that is not provided by the course and is not free on the internet

There were so many spelling errors, tests were not set up proper ie words an lines all over the place. The people talking were hard to listen to as there was spit talking, lip smacking, heavy accents which made it hard to understand. there was also so much extra speaking that was making the learning dry and boring. I would never suggest this to anyone

very well learning material very informative but i have a issue for this course that after completion this course i get 92% in assignment there is mention that you passed but not provide certificate, please help me and provide certificate via email or my learning page. i really need this please. Regards, Owais

Old school. Tests are not good at all. Review the assessments to not be a PubQuiz questions (name of people that create a theory, number of categories, etc). I did not feel engaged

Low production value, confusing questions, surface-level advice.

Lack of diverse voices and out-of-date references.

Boring and unengaging! Take it off my timeline.

General speaking that do not include any tools

Not a practical and very boring course.

It was not intrigueing or interactive.

too theoretical and boring